Thursday, August 14, 2008
Week 7, Thing #16: Aloha Wiki!
As a person with a B.A. in History, I was really excited to find the Sample AP World History Wiki. The purpose of the wiki was so that students created a study guide that they would use to study for the AP World History exam. Building the wiki as a class gave them an opportunity to learn how to work in a group, create content using technology, and study for the AP test. I wonder if the class enjoyed creating the wiki as much as I enjoyed reading it.
Meredith Farkas' article helped me see how wikis could be applied in libraries. I especially liked her idea about how wikis could be connected to library catalogs, so that patrons could read recommendations written by other patrons. I think that this would be extremely helpful at the middle school library where I work at, because students will check out a book that has been enjoyed by other students like them. And having the recommendations written online will allow all types of students (the ones who chatter away when I ask them how they liked a book to the ones who are too shy to talk to me) to write about how they felt about a book. For our school, our staff could create a wiki that contains the reading lists of all the English and Social Studies teachers. This way, these reading lists were located in one place and it would be easy to edit this list too. Students and parents could easily consult this list when they're in the school library, public library, or bookstore.
This exploration really made me a believer of wikis. I excited to discover other ways they can help our school and library the next school year.
Sunday, August 10, 2008
Week 6, Thing #15: Our Future Libraries and Selves
I read these three perspectives on Library 2.0: Rick Anderson's Away from the "icebergs", Michael Stephens' Into a new world of librarianship and Dr. Wendy Schultz's To a temporary place in time...
These three perspectives illustrate important stances in the Library 2.0 conversation. All three wrestled with the old and the new, and proposed a resolution.
I was most interested in what these people had to say about the relationship between librarians and patrons and how it is transforming. I agreed with Schultz's comment that "tagclouds offer diverse connections, not focussed expertise" in my previous post about the disadvantages of tagging. She asserts that with Library 2.0, patrons will continue to require "experienced tour guides" to steer them in the right direction. I agree that with the current information density of the Internet, media, and print, patrons will require another human being to help them. Even though library patrons today are intelligent information finders in their own right, their information needs will call for a professional. Schultz is correct in stating that future librarians “will put a premium on service, on tailoring information to needs, and on developing participatory relationships with customers." I appreciated Stephens’ definition of quality library 2.0 service and how librarians can cultivate a collaborative relationship with patrons.
I was also awed by Schultz’s futuristic, yet nostalgic, vision of libraries. She detailed the evolution of libraries from commodity, product, service and finally to experience. It appears that coffee is an analogue for information; for coffee that once merely served a function is now an experience. Why not say the same for information? I could even argue that reading within our present libraries is a fulfilling experience—at least for me. It is interesting to dream of libraries as “knowledge spas.” And if the libraries of the future will be luxuries, I want to be the type of librarian who helps people see that they are luxuries that *should* be indulged in and are affordable to all. I believe that libraries are not merely a place to “experience” information but are instruments of social mobility and self-realization.
Library 2.0 for me is to fulfill the roles of a teacher-librarian utilizing new technologies. It is to harness new web technologies to inspire a time-honored skill: a love of reading and learning. This goal, to inspire a love of reading and learning, can only be attained when librarians and students have a reciprocal and collaborative relationship. It just so happens that the success of Library 2.0 is contingent upon it.
I see School Library 2.0 as a place where teachers and librarians help students recognize their digital information finding skills, and develop them via teaching web 2.0 tools and experimenting with them. As we are experimenting with web 2.0 tools here. School Library 2.0 is a place where students can find the information they seek, the information that helps them define who they are as a person and discover who they want to become. It is a place where they can express themselves creatively, asserting themselves in self-created images that can be re-written and re-fashioned as they see fit.
School Library 2.0 is not just a place where technology and education merge, but it is a place where minds young and old converse and discover themselves.
Tuesday, July 15, 2008
Week 6, Thing #14: Technorati and Tags or Which Prince Did You Mean?
I checked out the top 5 blogs of Technorati and was immediately attracted to Lifehacker, tips and downloads for getting things done. It's a blog about how to utilize web "apps" applications to help you simplify your life and "get things done." I liked this post about Google web apps because it reminded me of when I discovered Google reader (see Week 4, Thing #8: It's as simple as RSS!).
An obvious advantage to tagging is that it organizes all types of information. Tagging enables authors and readers to organize their websites, blogs, online newspaper articles, and pictures with any label they desire. These self/user-imposed labels allows readers to organize information in a manner that is convenient for them, in a taxonomy written in their own language. With tagging, my Prince (the musician or The Artist Formally Known as The Artist) links will not mix with Machiavelli's The Prince links nor with my Prince William of Wales links--unless I want them to. Herein lies the disadvantage of tagging, because I am free to tag any piece of information with any label I want even if there is no clear relationship between the tag and tagged item.
Even though tags are a double-edged sword, sifting through it all is an exercise that sharpens my information finding skills.
Thursday, July 10, 2008
Week 6, Thing #13: Remedying Information Indigestion
Now I see why everyone, librarians especially, are so excited. When I browsed through SJLibraryLearning2's Del.icio.us account, I noted the various tags that were alphabetically organized to the right. After clicking on one, another window of related tags popped up. This simplifies my search for websites on related topics. I envision Del.icio.us as an easy way for librarians and teachers to set up a public index (that can be accessed anywhere) for students written in a language they understand. Since the tags are user-generated, teachers can create an account and direct students to their lists of websites grouped by topic. So if I wanted to create a list of the blogs of my favorite teen romance novels I could tag them "teen_romance" or "young_love" and not confuse my students with traditional subject headings like "Interpersonal relations--Fiction." Del.icio.us is also useful for organizing the myriad of bookmarks you already possess and the ones you continue to add daily. I will have to peruse the Del.icio.us accounts of libraries to witness how it is used in libraries and schools.
*Edit July 14, 2008*
So I explored a the Del.icio.us accounts of libraries that were posted on the CSLA School Library Learning 2.0 page for thing #13. The San Mateo Public Library's Del.icio.us page was the most useful because it organized websites according to the Dewey Decimal System. By organizing websites using the Dewey Decimal System, it was easier to imagine the ways in which information on the Internet intersects with the information found on library shelves. The Alameda County Library Del.icio.us page categorized their websites was according to topics of interest. I noticed, however, that when I visited the websites of these libraries it was not very easy to find a link of their Del.icio.us pages. I am curious to know how patrons are discovering their libraries' Del.icio.us pages and if they are being utilized.
Monday, April 21, 2008
Week 5, Thing #12: Roll(yo) Call!
Searchrolls are interesting because they are crafted from websites that are deemed relevant by its creator. For example, I tried The Big Answer Deck searchroll, and put in "ostrich" and I automatically got articles from wikipedia. But this is why Rollyo can be so useful when doing internet research, you can choose to include or exclude any website you want! I see great potential for Rollyo when teaching students about internet research. The majority of the librarians I know discourage students from using wikipedia or solely relying on Google for their research projects. Rollyo is one way to ensure that students are utilizing the correct internet sources. Teachers can use Rollyo to are expose their students to authoritative internet websites. They could even cross-reference the results of different searchrolls to demonstrate bias in internet searches and the importance of scrutinizing the academic authority of websites.
Rollyo's potential uses are not only for research, but also for recreation. You could create Harry Potter searchrolls or graphic novel searchrolls for fun. A searchroll can be created for any interest.
Creating my own searchroll was difficult, because I wanted to make sure that I had chosen relevant and authoritative websites. I tried creating a movie searchroll, using my favorite movie websites, but I found that it only works when you enter the title of a movie. I plan on tinkering with it further so that I can enter a keyword and out pops a list of movies. I am sure that there must be a website like this already. I also created a searchroll with my favorite dictionary websites, which includes my favorite slang website as well! This way, you can browse through various definitions of one word--like a very sloppy, poor makeshift version of the Oxford Dictionary.
Rollyo is another internet tool I foresee using fondly and frequently.
Thursday, March 13, 2008
Week 5, Thing #11: My Personal Music Library
The only downside to Pandora is that you are unable to skip a certain number of songs in an hour, which allows for the unfortunate situation of you stuck listening to a song you really don't like. When this happens, the site suggests that you create a new music station to listen to a new song, which isn't so bad.
Pandora would be great in libraries that provide music CDs for its patrons. Just how we recommend books based on what books our patrons have read in the past, Pandora could provide music recommendations. Another feature of Pandora is its artist search, which provides the artist's biography and selected discography (complete tracks!) for free. Pandora would be a great starting point for research projects on musicians, for its artist search contains the biographies and discographies of Beethoven and The Beatles.
This is truly my new favorite website!
